Which statement about exemptions in the Data Privacy Act is true?

The statement regarding personal information processed for artistic purposes being exempt is accurate. Under the Data Privacy Act, certain categories of personal information processing can be exempted from the regulatory provisions, particularly when it is done for artistic, literary, or journalistic purposes. This exemption is rooted in balancing the right to privacy with the freedoms of expression and creativity.

This reflects the understanding that while personal information should be protected, there are contexts—such as art and journalism—where the use of such information is vital for cultural discourse and public interest. This exemption encourages artistic creation and expression without imposing undue restriction that could stifle creativity.

The other options do not reflect the principles outlined in the Data Privacy Act. The claim that all personal information processing is exempt contradicts the foundational aim of the Act, which is to protect personal data. Similarly, stating that only information for research purposes can be exempt is misleading, as exemptions can apply to various categories and not exclusively to research. Lastly, the assertion that personal information processing is never allowed misrepresents the Act’s overall objective, which allows for processing but establishes strict guidelines and conditions under which it can occur.